Posted in Free Society, Government Regulations, Liberty, Philosophy, Policy Issues, Representative Republic vs. Democracy, Rule of Law, U.S. Constitution, U.S. Security, Uncategorized

The True Story of the Reichstag Fire and the Nazi Rise to Power | History | Smithsonian Magazine

You may want to read the Smithsonian piece about the Reichstag Fire first, then consider it in light of the political events of the past year 4 years.

Here’s an excerpt:

“In January 1933, Hindenburg reluctantly appointed Hitler as chancellor on the advice of Franz von Papen, a disgruntled former chancellor who believed the conservative bourgeois parties should ally with the Nazis to keep the Communists out of power. March 5 was set as the date for another series of Reichstag elections in hopes that one party might finally achieve the majority.

Meanwhile, the Nazis seized even more power, infiltrating the police and empowering ordinary party members as law enforcement officers. On February 22, Hitler used his powers as chancellor to enroll 50,000 Nazi SA men (also known as stormtroopers) as auxiliary police. Two days later, Hermann Göring, Minister of the Interior and one of Hitler’s closest compatriots, ordered a raid on Communist headquarters. Following the raid, the Nazis announced (falsely) that they’d found evidence of seditious material. They claimed the Communists were planning to attack public buildings.

On the night of February 27, around 9:00, pedestrians near the Reichstag heard the sound of breaking glass. Soon after, flames erupted from the building. It took fire engines hours to quell the fire, which destroyed the debating chamber and the Reichstag’s gilded cupola, ultimately causing over $1 million in damage. Police arrested an unemployed Dutch construction worker named Marinus van der Lubbe on the scene. The young man was found outside the building with firelighters in his possession and was panting and sweaty.

“This is a God-given signal,” Hitler told von Papen when they arrived on the scene. “If this fire, as I believe, is the work of the Communists, then we must crush out this murderous pest with an iron fist.”

A few hours later, on February 28, Hindenburg invoked Article 48 and the cabinet drew up the “Decree of the Reich President for the Protection of the People and State.” The act abolished freedom of speech, assembly, privacy and the press; legalized phone tapping and interception of correspondence; and suspended the autonomy of federated states, like Bavaria. That night around 4,000 people were arrested, imprisoned and tortured by the SA. Although the Communist party had won 17 percent of the Reichstag elections in November 1932, and the German people elected 81 Communist deputies in the March 5 elections, many were detained indefinitely after the fire. Their empty seats left the Nazis largely free to do as they wished.”

As you read THE SMITHSONIAN article, think about the convenient political alignment of ANTIFA & BLM with previously centrist Democrats. Consider how the FBI, under the Obama administration, spied on the Trump campaign as a predicate to construct a false narrative that Trump solicited Russian election interference (i.e. the Democrat funded, opposition research Steele dossier, etc). Recall the FBI sting of General Flynn where even the facts called for halting the investigation; yet hand written notes from those pushing the investigation spoke of the importance of “getting him to lie”. Or the heavily armed FBI assault team raid on elderly Roger Stone’s home home at 4 AM for allegedly making false statements to Congress and witness interference. Recall the January 2021 incident at the Capital where barricades were abandoned by police allowing easy passage of peaceful and not-so-peaceful protesters and subsequent accusations of seditious activity of Trump and any known sympathizer.  Reflect on the lopsided 17:1 ratio of left-leaning to conservative leaning professors that dominate the humanities departments of our universities. Or that over 90% of political contributions from teacher’s unions historically go to Democrat candidates and progressive legislation.

It seems obvious to me that the threat to our democracy doesn’t come from concerns of seditious activity on the right or unfounded fears of Trump refusing to leave the White House. The political lessons in the aftermath of the Reichstag Fire teach us that the threat comes from the radical left’s crackdown on free speech where any opinions not deemed mainstream are equated with subversion & violence; and a coercive political media-driven assault on our liberties and the protections outlined in the Constitution. Ask yourself if the experiment in representative republic self-governance called the United States of America can survive with one party rule.

The NAZI party rose to power by a carefully orchestrated & choreographed manipulation of public opinion against their political opponents, led by a compliant and often complicit media.  Considering the disastrous consequences to individual liberty, be it from the Statism of the radical left or the Autocratic Fascism of the far right, the left’s political tactics and agenda should set off alarm bells in our collective heads.  

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/true-story-reichstag-fire-and-nazis-rise-power-180962240/

Posted in Free Society, Government Regulations, Liberty, Rule of Law, Technology, U.S. Constitution, Uncategorized

Watch “Vote Manipulation Michigan-Style 7: Election Workers Testimony 2” on YouTube

It matters NOT for whom you voted; the manner in which these Michigan ballots were handled, counted and tabulated was fraudulent on many levels.

How can any reasonable, intelligent person listen to this testimony and believe that election law was followed?

This should frighten every single citizen; regardless of your political affiliation.

Posted in Access to healthcare, Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare), American Presidents, big government, Consumer-Driven Health Care, Direct-Pay Medicine, Direct-Pay Practice Models, Economic Issues, Free-Market, Government Regulations, Health Insurance, Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA), Health Savings Accounts (HSA's), Healthcare financing, Individual Market, Individual ObamaCare Market, Insurance subsidies, Medical Costs, Medical Practice Models, News From Washington, Patient Choice, Patient-centered Care, Policy Issues, Price Tansparency, primary care, Subsidies, Uncategorized

Fund the Money Pit or Move to Sustainable Patient-Centered Care: Rethinking Health Care Policy | RealClearHealth

Despite proposals from Biden to double-down on the current dysfunction, the Republicans have not coalesced around one plan, though many market-friendly reforms have been floated. Given the obvious fatal flaws of the Affordable Care Act and lack of political will to confront the real cost-drivers, many have lost faith in a government solution for a problem that government largely caused.

Fortunately, the private sector has brought forward new ideas for health care reforms, and these promise access to affordable and innovative care on our terms. Alternative market-driven options exist that improve access, reduce costs, and move patients into closer relationships with their doctors instead of with government bureaucracies.

https://www.realclearhealth.com/articles/2020/11/30/fund_the_money_pit_or_move_to_sustainable_patient-centered_care_rethinking_health_care_policy_111144.html

Posted in big government, CDC, Dependency, Education, Government Regulations, Liberty, Organizational structure, Patient Choice, Patient Safety, Philosophy, Policy Issues, Prevention, Protocols, Rule of Law, Uncategorized

The CDC Perspective on COVID Shielding Approaches and Green Zones: A Humanitarian Oxymoron?

Manitoba Metis Federation minister of energy and infrastructure minister Jack Park hosts a video tour of a 96-room camp the federation is setting up for people who may need to isolate or quarantine if the coronavirus hits a high number of people. (Screenshot)

 

The comments below are in response to a CDC article entitled, Operational Considerations for Humanitarian Settings. As citizens with sovereign rights, we need to be aware of the “operational considerations” being discussed by policymakers & influencers, because there is not ONE reference to, or acknowledgement of, the individual right of self-determination or rights of families to make decisions for themselves.

Leave it to the public health theorists, who truly believe it’s their job to war-game these scenarios (and then make our decisions for us) to miss the obvious.

Like, for instance, the fact that things rarely turn out optimally.  Their planning should not only acknowledge that reality, but the ACTUAL final plan should assume bad stuff happens and reflect that reality in its design.

But alas, that’s not what we get with Green Zone Shielding Approach to those at high risk for COVID19.

As a person with common sense and a hopeful future, you would not store kindling in same box as flammable accelerants. Nor, would you stow all weapons & ammunition in same cache; or invest all funds in the same asset class.  No, you wouldn’t protect your precious resources that way; you would minimize your risk by using strategies designed to diversify, shield, obscure your cargo from theft, devaluation or damage.

To be fair, the CDC acknowledges…“Inadvertent introduction of the virus into a green zone may result in rapid transmission among the most vulnerable populations the approach is trying to protect.”  They seem confident that careful central planning can mitigate that risk.

So here’s an excerpt from a CDC article about humanitarian issues pertaining to shielding approaches for those at high-risk for COVID. The article’s stated purpose was to give the CDC’s perspective on and challenges to…“implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings.”1,2 

It goes on to state, “High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level…”

  • “Neighbors “swap” households to accommodate high-risk individuals.”
  • “A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together.”
  • “No movement into or outside the green zone.”

Other considerations:

  • “Plan for an extended duration of implementation time, at least 6 months.”
  • “Ensure safe and protective environments for all individuals, including minors and individuals who require additional care whether they are in the green zone or remain in a household after the primary caregiver or income provider has moved to the green zone.”

Note the focus on “camps, displaced populations and low resource settings.” No one should be comfortable with the historical images conjured up by that quote. Need I say more?

In the summary section, the CDC authors admit the shielding approach is “ambitious” but offer no proof of concept. 

Specifically they state, “The shielding approach is an ambitious undertaking, which may prove effective in preventing COVID-19 infection among high-risk populations if well managed. While the premise is based on mitigation strategies used in the United Kingdom,24,25 there is no empirical evidence whether this approach will increase, decrease or have no effect on morbidity and mortality during the COVID-19 epidemic in various humanitarian settings.”

What could possibly go wrong?

Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings | CDC

Posted in American Exceptionalism, American Independence, Dependency, Economic Issues, Education, Foreign policy, Free Society, Free-Market, Liberty, Neo-conservatism, Philosophy, Policy Issues, Progressivism, Rule of Law, U.S. Constitution, U.S. Security, Uncategorized

Why I Love America | NORA DIMITROVA CLINTON

Capitalism Magazine

The antidote to anti-American indoctrination is to keep proving, with facts and reason, the unique advantages of American society compared to other past or present civilizations. This will expose the double standard of anti-Americanism, which demonizes democracy’s imperfections but condones oppressive regimes’ crimes against humanity. It would significantly broaden and deepen children’s patriotic instruction in school. In college, instead of Marxist pseudo-science offered with a hefty price-tag, students would benefit from a rigorous training in American history and foundational philosophy contrasted with other political, economical, and social systems since ancient times and across the globe.

Educating people about America’s time-honored virtues as compared to the rest of the world will provide a much-needed frame of reference—a historical and geographical perspective that will give us a 20/20 vision of how good we have it. It will arm us with solid knowledge—with the unshakable realization that we cannot equate the flaws of a free country with the unfathomable atrocities of tyrannical governments. It will pierce the veil of cancel-culture groupthink and uncover its totalitarian core.

https://www.capitalismmagazine.com/2020/11/why-i-love-america/

Posted in American Exceptionalism, American Independence, American Presidents, big government, Capers, Dependency, Entitlements, Free Society, government incompetence, Government Regulations, Government Spending, Influence peddling, Liberty, News From Washington, News From Washington, DC & Related Shenanigans, Philosophy, Policy Issues, Quotes from American Presidents, Representative Republic vs. Democracy, Rule of Law, U.S. Constitution, U.S. Security, Uncategorized

Will Democracy’s Myths Doom Liberty? | Mises Wire

“It is time to demystify democracy. The surest effect of exalting democracy is to make it easier for politicians to drag everyone else down. Until presidents and members of Congress begin to honor their oath to uphold and defend the Constitution, they deserve all the distrust and disdain they receive. Americans need less faith in democracy and more faith in their own liberty.

The phrases which consecrate democracy seep into many Americans’ minds like buried hazardous waste.

If Joe Biden wins the presidential election, voters will be told that our political system is redeemed: the “will of the people” is now clear, Biden will rule with “the consent of the governed,” and Americans are obliged to again trust and obey the federal government. If Donald Trump is reelected, much of the same media will continue howling about imaginary Russian plots. But these notions remain dangerous delusions regardless of who is declared the winner on Election Day.

Americans are encouraged to believe that their vote on Election Day somehow miraculously guarantees that the subsequent ten thousand actions by the president, Congress, and federal agencies embody “the will of the people.” In reality, the more edicts a president issues, the less likely that his decrees will have any connection to popular preferences. It is even more doubtful that all the provisions of hefty legislative packages reflect majority support, considering the wheeling, dealing, and conniving prior to final passage. 

A 2017 survey by Rasmussen Reports found that only 23 percent of Americans believe that the federal government has “the consent of the governed.” Political consent is defined these days as rape was defined a generation or two ago: people consent to anything which they do not forcibly resist. 

Voters cannot complain about getting screwed after being enticed into a voting booth. Anyone who does not attempt to burn down city hall presumably consented to everything the mayor did. Anyone who does not jump the White House fence and try to storm into the Oval Office consents to all executive orders. Anyone who doesn’t firebomb the nearest federal office building consents to the latest edicts in the Federal Register. And if people do attack government facilities, then they are terrorists who can be justifiably killed or imprisoned forever.

In the short term, the most dangerous democratic delusion is that conducting an election makes government trustworthy again. 

When scandals erupt, citizens will be told to trust politically approved fixes to the system—even though most Washington reforms are like fighting crime by hiding the corpses of victims.

Until presidents and members of Congress begin to honor their oath to uphold and defend the Constitution, they deserve all the distrust and disdain they receive. Americans need less faith in democracy and more faith in their own liberty.”

https://mises.org/wire/will-democracys-myths-doom-liberty

Posted in Capers, Free Society, Influence peddling, Liberty, Philosophy, Policy Issues, Rule of Law, Technology, U.S. Constitution, U.S. Security, Uncategorized

Meet NBC News’ Brandy Zadrozny – The Woman In Charge of Doxxing and Destroying Trump Supporters – Revolver

Zadrozny wrote a guide on how to unethically dox anonymous people online. Zadrozny appears to use paid, dark-data search engines to dox the personal information of anonymous Trump supporters online — obtaining property records, phone information, and even their Amazon wish lists.

“…Zadrozny is part of a press corps deployed to cover “misinformation, disinformation, and extremism” after the Internet fueled President Donald Trump’s win in 2016. This new journo beat was created to surveil, slander, and censor online voices that counter ruling class narratives.”

https://www.revolver.news/2020/10/brandy-zadrozny-dox-trump-supporters-glamorize-pedophiles/

Posted in Currency Manipulation, Dependency, Economic Issues, Education, Free Society, Liberty, Neo-conservatism, Philosophy, Policy Issues, Progressivism, Representative Republic vs. Democracy, Rule of Law, U.S. Constitution, U.S. Security, Uncategorized

The Battle Isn’t Right vs. Left. It’s Statism vs. Individualism – Foundation for Economic Education

Given the expanding role of government and erosion of individual liberty that occurs under both fascism & socialism, and the murderous history of each, why is communism/collectivism so much more palatable than National Socialism?

https://fee.org/articles/the-battle-isnt-right-vs-left-it-s-statism-vs-individualism/