Posted in big government, Economic Issues, Free Society, Free-Market, Government Regulations, Government Spending, Income Inequality, Job loss, Liberty, Policy Issues, Tax Policy, Uncategorized

A Case for Less Central Planning & More Individual Economic Freedom

Data analyzed from the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom Index makes a solid case for the benefits of more individual economic freedom and less central planning.

Across time and comparing all levels of society, be it communities, States or between countries, those with more economic freedom as measured by the Economic Freedom Index enjoy…

  • Less unemployment
  • Higher incomes
  • Less poverty
  • Less income inequality
  • Less gender inequality
  • Less child labor abuses

All six of these factors should tend to maximize cooperation between groups and foster more peace and less conflict. By extension, then, it appears a case can be made that the ideal role of government is to prevent us from harming each other, ensure a fair regulatory playing field, enforce laws fairly, honor contracts and otherwise grant maximal economic freedom to individuals to do as the wish so long as they don’t harm others financially or physically.

Posted in Economic Issues, Education, Free Society, Free-Market, Leadership, Liberty, outcomes, outcomes measurement, Philosophy, Policy Issues, Uncategorized

Watch “The Day 2 Problem for Egalitarianism | Prof. James Otteson” on YouTube

Professor Otteson discusses the fatal flaws of redistributive planned economies, not the least of which is a decline in cooperative innovation.

Posted in Economic Issues, Education, Entitlements, Free Society, Free-Market, government incompetence, Government Regulations, Liberty, Philosophy, Policy Issues, Poverty, Rule of Law, Uncategorized, Wealth

Watch “John Stossel – Influence of Milton Friedman” on YouTube

Milton Friedman’s core message was that personal freedom and economic freedom go hand in hand.

Pursuing life, liberty & happiness must be accomplished by individuals, and can’t be granted to us by bureaucrats or gov’t programs.

Milton Friedman understood this and trumpeted this message throughout his life.

Posted in Cost of labor, Economic Issues, Education, Free Society, Free-Market, government incompetence, Job loss, Keynesian Economics, Leadership, Liberty, Minimum wage, Philosophy, Policy Issues, Poverty, Rule of Law, Uncategorized, Wealth

Bernie Sanders Gets a Lesson in What a $15 Minimum Wage Would Mean – Reason.com

“…it’s telling to see how Sanders’ campaign responded to the allegation that the Vermont socialist is not putting his money where his mouth is.

In a statement, Shakir stressed that Sanders’ campaign “offers wages and benefits competitive with other campaigns, as is shown by the latest fundraising reports.”

Exactly! If Sanders’ campaign can find a sufficient number of employees willing to work for $10 an hour or $12 an hour, that’s fine. No one is being coerced to work for him, and he’s paying what the market for field workers allows.

Sanders the politician likes to criticize other employers for doing exactly what he’s doing.

“Americans should not be subsidizing the richest family in America and Walmart workers should not be living in poverty,” Sanders tweeted last month, castigating the big box retailer for not paying all workers $15 per hour. “Walmart’s greed has got to end,” he added.

But Sanders the employer surely knows that paying field workers $12 an hour instead of $15 per hour will allow his campaign to hire more field workers. He’s not employing those people because it makes him feel good to do it, and he’s not paying less than $15 per hour because he’s a skinflint multi-millionaire who is too greedy to care about workers. He’s employing them to help him succeed in a highly competitive arena where small margins can make a big difference.

When the problems with a government mandated minimum wage are so obvious that even a socialist’s campaign can’t help but acknowledge them, it should probably make you wonder if Sanders the politician is being willfully ignorant about one of his centerpiece proposals.

https://reason.com/2019/07/19/bernie-sanders-gets-a-lesson-in-what-a-15-minimum-wage-would-mean/

Posted in big government, Consumption Inequality, Cost of labor, Economic Issues, Free-Market, Government Regulations, Government Spending, Income Inequality, Liberty, Minimum wage, National Debt, Policy Issues, Poverty, Progressivism, Rule of Law, Uncategorized, Wealth

Sorry, Bernie Sanders, but Disney Doesn’t Have To Apologize for Making $1.3 Billion with Avengers: Endgame – Reason.com

More importantly, if you care about improving the quality of life and living standards over time, the essential question is always about creating broad-based, sustainable economic growth. What are the conditions that are most likely to help the economy get bigger, stronger, and more resilient? At the top of the list is a government which promulgates simple, predictable, and widely enforced rules; spends within its limits and doesn’t pursue arbitrary trade wars and military interventions; and doesn’t bog down the future with an ever-increasing mountain of debt that tamps down growth and freezes out investment. Near the bottom of the list is something that is part of Sanders’ policy repertoire: Announcing bold new plans (Medicare for All! Free College for All!) without even pretending to know how to pay for them.

https://reason.com/2019/04/30/sorry-bernie-sanders-but-disney-doesnt-to-apologize-for-making-1-3-billion-with-avengers-endgame/

Posted in Access to healthcare, advance-pricing, CPT billing, Direct-Pay Practice Models, Economic Issues, Free Society, Free-Market, Healthcare financing, Liberty, Organizational structure, outcomes, Policy Issues, Price Tansparency, Quality, Rule of Law, Uncategorized

Under-Appreciated Benefits of Markets

By Robert Nelson, MD

Honest price-transparent markets allow value propositions to surface and to be discovered.

Contrary to the outcries of many academics, intellectuals and utopian collectivist, free markets don’t create wide-spread abuses or anarchy in peaceful law-abiding Societies. The anti-market narrative attempts to impune the term “free” in free-markets by equating it with lawlessness and all manner of fraudulent activity; rather than acknowledging that “free” means maximal freedom from unnecessary economic distortions. One only has to look at the litany of government scandals (VA comes to mind) to conclude that vice is not intrinsic to, or a consequence of, the exercise of free commerce, but rather a malevolent side of human behavior.

Markets not only provide a functional platform for innovation and creative destruction, but can help suppress waste, fraud and abuse by aligning incentives such that mutually beneficial outcomes are the rule, not the exception. Markets that are willing to operate in the light of transparency are in stark contrast to systems where avarice and other human foibles seek cover behind complex non-transparent systems or within unaccountable bureaucratic hierarchies.

In healthcare, the behemoth we call the 3rd party payment apparatus (and regulatory morass that supports it) often creates an environment which, unlike a more transparent market-oriented approach, allows bad behavior to go unchecked longer.

To the extent that we view market transparency, and all the downstream benefits that result from full disclosure, as the best chance of uncovering AND discouraging human vice, then many of the bad actors and bad behavior will be found out more readily. This approach benefits all stakeholders in healthcare.

Also, transparent pricing & markets naturally lends to transparency in quality measures, and thus better value propositions.

We should embrace changes which incorporate as many intrinsic disincentives to bad behavior as possible, as well as maximize the correct incentives – which helps healthy & sustainable endeavors to thrive.

Posted in American Exceptionalism, big government, Crony Capitalism, Dependency, Economic Issues, Free Society, Free-Market, Government Regulations, Government Spending, Influence peddling, Keynesian Economics, Liberty, Organizational structure, Policy Issues, Progressivism, Tax Policy, Uncategorized, Welfare State

Watch “How Big Should Government Be? Left vs. Right #1” on YouTube