Posted in outcomes, Uncategorized, Unsettled Science

Probiotics Work for Kids With AGE, Right? Not so Fast!

There was little difference in the numbers of children in each group who developed moderate to severe AGE by day 14 (11.8% of the treatment group vs 12.6% of the placebo group). Differences in the secondary outcomes were also minimal. For example, the duration of diarrhea was 54.3 hours (medium) in the treatment group vs 52.4 hours in the placebo group. The duration of vomiting was essentially 27 hours in both groups. A total of 4.8% of the treatment group vs 4.5% of the placebo group required hospitalization for their illness, and 59.2% of both groups were febrile.

Source: Probiotics Work for Kids With AGE, Right? Not so Fast!

Posted in Disease Prevention, Nutrition, outcomes, outcomes measurement, Patient Safety, primary care, Protocols, Quality, Uncategorized, Unsettled Science

RHR: What the Latest Research Says about Probiotics, with Lucy Mailing

We’ve been told for years that we should take probiotics after a course of antibiotics in order to restore healthy gut flora.

And most of us have been telling our clients and patients that as well. I know I have.

But what if that’s not the right advice?

What if probiotics could actually delaythe recovery of the microbiome after antibiotics?

It sounds crazy, I know—but that’s exactly what a recent, well-designed study has found.

https://chriskresser.com/what-the-latest-research-says-about-probiotics-with-lucy-mailing/

Posted in Disease Prevention, Education, Evidence-based Medicine, Nutrition, outcomes measurement, Patient Safety, Prevention, Uncategorized

The Probiotics Trend: Should We Be All In or Call Time Out?

Whoa!!! Let’s slow down the probiotic wagon train!

1) Researchers began by giving probiotics to germ-free mice, in which they were actually able to induce the desired microbial changes. When they gave the probiotics to mice that were already colonized with their own innate bacteria, however, there were evident resistance patterns. They were not able to induce the colonization that they thought they would when they gave the probiotic. The same effect was evident when they tested it in humans. There seems to be certain bacterial resistant patterns in hosts that either facilitate or block the colonization intended by this probiotic effect.

2) Researchers found that there was a rapid reconstitution of the normal biome when they gave the patients their pre-antibiotic stool back. Comparatively, the use of probiotics was associated with a marked delay in patients being able to return to what their normal microbiome was before antibiotics.

3) Nearly a third or more of all trials included reported no adverse event monitoring or harm, whereas 98% provided no adequate documentation, validation, or standardization in reporting adverse events or serious adverse events. Given the high variability in the quality of existing data, the authors concluded that it may be too premature to make any broad conclusions about the safety of these interventions.

Certainly, just like any other medication, potential harm needs to be assessed in probiotics.

Source: The Probiotics Trend: Should We Be All In or Call Time Out?